B.07/04: Initial results management framework of the Fund

The Board, having reviewed document GCF/B.07/04 Initial Results Management Framework of the Fund:  

1. Affirms that the elements of the initial results management framework of the Fund contained in this decision complement decision B.05/03, including the initial result areas of the Fund referred to in that decision, as contained in Annex I to document GCF/B.05/23, as well as the performance indicators of the initial result areas of the Fund also referred to in that decision, as contained in Annex II of document GCF/B.05/23;
2. Adopts the elements of the initial results management framework of the Fund as outlined hereunder:
   
   1. Levels of the logic model:
      • Paradigm shift objective
      • Impacts (Fund level)
      • Project/Programme outcomes
      • Project/Programme outputs
      • Activities
      • Inputs
   2. Initial mitigation logic model:
      
      1. Paradigm shift objective for mitigation:
         • Shift to low-emission sustainable development pathways;
      2. Fund level impacts for mitigation:
         
         1. Reduced emissions through increased low-emission energy access and power generation;
         2. Reduced emissions through increased access to low-emission transport;
         3. Reduced emissions from buildings, cities, industries and appliances;
         4. Reduced emissions from land use, deforestation, forest degradation, and through sustainable forest management and conservation and enhancement of forest carbon stocks; 
      3. Project/programme level outcomes for mitigation:
         
         1. Strengthened institutional and regulatory systems for low-emission planning and development;
         2. Increased number of small, medium and large low-emission power suppliers;
         3. Lower energy intensity of buildings, cities, industries, and appliances;
         4. Increased use of low-carbon transport;
         5. Improved management of land or forest areas contributing to emissions reductions;
   3. Initial adaptation logic model:
      
      1. Paradigm shift objective for adaptation:
         • Increased climate-resilient sustainable development
      2. Fund level impacts for adaptation:
         
         1. Increased resilience and enhanced livelihoods of the most vulnerable people, communities, and regions;
         2. Increased resilience of health and well-being, and food and water security;
         3. Increased resilience of infrastructure and the built environment to climate change threats;
         4. Improved resilience of ecosystems and ecosystem services;
      3. Project/programme level outcomes for adaptation:
         
         1. Strengthened institutional and regulatory systems for climate- responsive planning and development;
         2. Increased generation and use of climate information in decision- making;
         3. Strengthened adaptive capacity and reduced exposure to climate risks;
         4. Strengthened awareness of climate threats and risk-reduction processes;
3. Adopts the following core indicators for mitigation:
   
   1. Tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2eq) reduced as a result of Fund-funded projects/programmes;
   2. Cost per tCO2eq decreased for all Fund-funded mitigation projects/programmes;
   3. Volume of finance leveraged by Fund funding, disaggregated by public and private sources;
4. Adopts the following core indicator for adaptation: Total number of direct and indirect beneficiaries; number of beneficiaries relative to total population;
5. Confirms that performance measured at the paradigm shift and impact levels refers to the aggregate project/programme-based results of the Fund;
6. Acknowledges that the inputs, activities, and outputs will be defined for each project/programme on a case-by-case basis;
7. Takes note of the initial performance indicators in Annex IX and Annex X to this document;
8. Affirms that national and sector-wide indicators will be used only at the discretion of the recipient country;
9. Decides that the results management framework should take a gender-sensitive approach and that the results should be disaggregated by gender where relevant;
10. Requests the Secretariat to further develop the mitigation and adaptation performance measurement frameworks of the Fund, engaging international experts as required, for the Board to consider at its third meeting of 2014, including an approach to gender, indicators on mitigation and adaptation, and methodologies, data sources, frequency, and responsibilities for reporting;
11. Further requests the Secretariat to develop a logic model and performance framework for ex-post REDD+ results-based payments, in accordance with the methodological guidance in the Warsaw framework for REDD+, for consideration at the third Board meeting of 2014.